Board Thread:Chapter Discourse/@comment-45961917-20200704051303/@comment-36009152-20200827115615

It would appear that no one is. Let's try an alteration in direction where assumptions are not made. For example there was no implication that others were saying that family isn't important.

If it was written "Mika would stay with the illusion of family" and the response was "he values his family so he has the right to do so" then "he is perfectly within his right to say forget it all family is most important" and in reply "who said family wasn't important" focusing on invented negatives isn't as constructive as amiable replies related to the thread.

"Mika's family is indeed of utmost importance and may help him reach his full potential, even an illusion of them if it makes him happy" is certainly a daring if needs to be mentioned possibility.