With the Pathway to User Rights document being established, this is both an example of, and an actual nomination to one of the user rights available.
The role in mind is the permanent uptake of the bureaucrat role, and the nomination is myself, User:S3r0-Ph1i
Where this blog post mentions the reasons why I feel I would be a good bureaucrat for the wiki.
So from the start, if one would like user rights, it is a case of essentially make a nomination! As the document details, users may nominate themselves, or others, this is to ensure everyone can feel comfortable putting forward a case, with no one sidelined since it's important to draw upon different working practices to benefit the wiki.
This is also an excellent announcement to demonstrate this process, and also shape it as well. The document is open for anyone to edit, and since is a community effort, everyone do add what you feel would be best in deciding who can help in these capacities. It's both a matter of forming a sensible document to help the wiki, and in forming one's own opinion in who could make best use of these areas, again, to help the wiki, so you decide!
Similar, comments are open for anyone to share their views, of which everyone should do. Comments in support, against, what you would like to see and why, again all your own views. That is the process in mind in the event that someone would like to help with user rights. Generally, in deciding who should get roles, now and in the future, try to think who is best for the wiki. In the Pathway to User Rights document there is guidance on which practices are constructive, and wider points to consider given the workings of the wiki. Perhaps what we should decide is who will use the tools best, who can represent the wiki well - it's for everyone to select the criteria they like.
A note on nominations, as with this one, when formally making one they must be open to everyone, not done in secret. By all means a random account can come in and write "we should make users who vandalize articles, and delete all the pages an admin", at which point definitely there should be the hope that someone could reply "that's not too helpful, but constructively taking part well is!" From users who have been on the wiki for a long time, to those who have just arrived, for this nomination and the user rights document, take part to make sound judgements natural, we are more than capable of getting this right for the Seraph of the End Wiki.
So in viewing this request for the bureaucrat role, everyone share your views, add amendments on the document, for, against, no opinion on this nomination. What’s important is to take part in a wiki wide venture in deciding who can help the wiki in a respective area. It's also about establishing something that works to ensure the wiki can benefit from constructive actions now and in the future.
For the nomination, have a read through the points then state whether you feel that would make for a good candidate to become the wiki's second bureaucrat. Again, it's for everyone to decide, the post can be kept open for a week, even longer, until everyone sees it - emphasis on the everyone decide this wiki path for themselves area.